Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support for set_memory_* outside of module space

2015-11-04 Thread Kees Cook
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 11/03/2015 03:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Laura Abbott >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Based on a recent discussion[1] there is interest in having set_memory_* >>> work >>> on kernel memory for security

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support for set_memory_* outside of module space

2015-11-04 Thread Laura Abbott
On 11/03/2015 03:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote: On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: Hi, Based on a recent discussion[1] there is interest in having set_memory_* work on kernel memory for security and other use cases. This patch adds the ability for that to happen behind a kernel opti

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Support for set_memory_* outside of module space

2015-11-03 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Laura Abbott wrote: > > Hi, > > Based on a recent discussion[1] there is interest in having set_memory_* work > on kernel memory for security and other use cases. This patch adds the > ability for that to happen behind a kernel option. If this is welcome enough, > t