On 2014/12/2 12:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30 November 2014 at 13:53, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> No, there are not utilities and scripts relying on it.
>
> How can you be so sure about it ? There might be scripts/utils you
> aren't aware of
> and are depending on this..
>
>> I just confuse that:
>
On 30 November 2014 at 13:53, Wang Weidong wrote:
> No, there are not utilities and scripts relying on it.
How can you be so sure about it ? There might be scripts/utils you
aren't aware of
and are depending on this..
> I just confuse that:
> If the policy->min and policy-max is changed while it
On 2014/11/30 6:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, November 29, 2014 09:40:02 AM Wang Weidong wrote:
>> On 2014/11/29 9:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Friday, November 28, 2014 10:43:37 AM Wang Weidong wrote:
Hi Rafael and Viresh
Sorry to trouble you again. As for:
On Saturday, November 29, 2014 09:40:02 AM Wang Weidong wrote:
> On 2014/11/29 9:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, November 28, 2014 10:43:37 AM Wang Weidong wrote:
> >> Hi Rafael and Viresh
> >>
> >> Sorry to trouble you again. As for:
> >> "acpi-cpufreq: get the cur_freq from acpi_proce
On 2014/11/29 9:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, November 28, 2014 10:43:37 AM Wang Weidong wrote:
>> Hi Rafael and Viresh
>>
>> Sorry to trouble you again. As for:
>> "acpi-cpufreq: get the cur_freq from acpi_processor_performance states"
>> I do it again, and add the other patch.
>>
>> p
On Friday, November 28, 2014 10:43:37 AM Wang Weidong wrote:
> Hi Rafael and Viresh
>
> Sorry to trouble you again. As for:
> "acpi-cpufreq: get the cur_freq from acpi_processor_performance states"
> I do it again, and add the other patch.
>
> patch #1: acpi-cpufreq: make the freq_table store the
6 matches
Mail list logo