On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:08:04PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:18 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
> > > on the
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:08:04PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:18 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
on the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex by
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:18 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
> > on the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex by replacing the global mutex with
> > a table of mutexes,
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:18 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
on the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex by replacing the global mutex with
a table of mutexes, selected based
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
> on the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex by replacing the global mutex with
> a table of mutexes, selected based on a hash. The original discussion can
> be found
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 07:27:23AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
This patchset attempts to reduce the amount of contention we impose
on the hugetlb_instantiation_mutex by replacing the global mutex with
a table of mutexes, selected based on a hash. The original discussion can
be found here:
6 matches
Mail list logo