Hi Mathieu,
> This change is done as a follow-up to the following thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/1/436
>
> qcom-wdt is currently assuming the presence of a dedicated node in DT
> to gets its configuration. However, on msm architecture, the watchdog is
> usually part of the timer block. S
On 02/20, Mathieu Olivari wrote:
> This change is done as a follow-up to the following thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/1/436
>
> qcom-wdt is currently assuming the presence of a dedicated node in DT
> to gets its configuration. However, on msm architecture, the watchdog is
> usually part o
On 02/23/15 13:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 20 February 2015 18:19:33 Mathieu Olivari wrote:
>> This change is done as a follow-up to the following thread:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/1/436
>>
>> qcom-wdt is currently assuming the presence of a dedicated node in DT
>> to gets its confi
On Friday 20 February 2015 18:19:33 Mathieu Olivari wrote:
> This change is done as a follow-up to the following thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/1/436
>
> qcom-wdt is currently assuming the presence of a dedicated node in DT
> to gets its configuration. However, on msm architecture, the wa
4 matches
Mail list logo