Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide

2021-02-07 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:37:46PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:26 PM Amy Parker wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:1 AM David Sterba wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote: > > > > As the EFS driver is old and non-mainta

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide

2021-02-05 Thread Richard Weinberger
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:26 PM Amy Parker wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:1 AM David Sterba wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote: > > > As the EFS driver is old and non-maintained, > > > > Is anybody using EFS on current kernels? There's not much point up

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide

2021-02-05 Thread Amy Parker
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:37 PM Richard Weinberger wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:26 PM Amy Parker wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:1 AM David Sterba wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote: > > > > As the EFS driver is old and non-maintained, >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide

2021-02-05 Thread Amy Parker
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:1 AM David Sterba wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote: > > As the EFS driver is old and non-maintained, > > Is anybody using EFS on current kernels? There's not much point updating > it to current coding style, deleting fs/efs is probably

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fs/efs: Follow kernel style guide

2021-02-05 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 08:52:14PM -0800, Amy Parker wrote: > As the EFS driver is old and non-maintained, Is anybody using EFS on current kernels? There's not much point updating it to current coding style, deleting fs/efs is probably the best option. The EFS name is common for several filesyste