On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 07:24 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> David,
>
> I applied various pieces from your patch on top of material
> that I already had, so that now we have the text below describing
> these limits. Comments/suggestions/improvements from all welcome.
Looks good, thank
On 06/03/2014 09:26 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Manfred,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
>>> I don't have ideas ho
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Manfred,
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
> > I don't have ideas how to improve it further.
>
> On the assumption that
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 07:27 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 12:08 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 22:40 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> >> Hi Davidlohr,
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2014-0
On 05/07/2014 12:08 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 22:40 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Davidlohr,
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
Hi Manfred,
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 22:40 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Davidlohr,
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> >> Hi Manfred,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
>
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 13:06 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > Hi Manfred,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
> >
Hi Davidlohr,
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Manfred,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
>> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch serie
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 15:16 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Manfred,
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
> > I don't have ideas how to improve it further.
>
> On the assumption that
Hi Manfred,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Manfred Spraul
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
> I don't have ideas how to improve it further.
On the assumption that your patches are heading to mainline, could you
send me a man-pages patch for the changes
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 06:23 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> On 04/21/2014 07:25 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 16:26 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
> >> I don't have ideas how to improve it further.
> >
On 04/21/2014 07:25 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 16:26 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
Hi all,
the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
I don't have ideas how to improve it further.
Manfred, is there any difference between this set and the one you sent a
couple o
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 16:26 +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the increase of SHMMAX/SHMALL is now a 4 patch series.
> I don't have ideas how to improve it further.
Manfred, is there any difference between this set and the one you sent a
couple of days ago?
>
> The change itself is tri
13 matches
Mail list logo
