Re: [PATCH 0/5] Prepare devicetrees for the new FSL QSPI driver

2018-12-15 Thread Shawn Guo
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 10:04:55AM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote: > I can confirm, that the series does only remove or add properties to the > devicetree, that are currently not used by the driver. Therefore it won't > break > anything. Okay, applied the series. Shawn

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Prepare devicetrees for the new FSL QSPI driver

2018-12-13 Thread Shawn Guo
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:45:04AM +, Schrempf Frieder wrote: > + Shawn, Sascha > > On 10.12.18 17:31, Schrempf Frieder wrote: > > Hi FSL/ARM maintainers, > > > > On 10.12.18 17:26, Schrempf Frieder wrote: > >> From: Frieder Schrempf > >> > >> We have prepared a new driver for the FSL QSPI c

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Prepare devicetrees for the new FSL QSPI driver

2018-12-13 Thread Schrempf Frieder
+ Shawn, Sascha On 10.12.18 17:31, Schrempf Frieder wrote: > Hi FSL/ARM maintainers, > > On 10.12.18 17:26, Schrempf Frieder wrote: >> From: Frieder Schrempf >> >> We have prepared a new driver for the FSL QSPI controller that works under >> the SPI framework. The current devicetrees are broken

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Prepare devicetrees for the new FSL QSPI driver

2018-12-10 Thread Schrempf Frieder
Hi FSL/ARM maintainers, On 10.12.18 17:26, Schrempf Frieder wrote: > From: Frieder Schrempf > > We have prepared a new driver for the FSL QSPI controller that works under > the SPI framework. The current devicetrees are broken because they use an > inconsistent scheme for assigning the reg prope