Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-03-15 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 03/15/2013 12:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann : > On Wednesday 13 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> In case we end-up with an agreement on the path those fixes should >> follow, here is the location of my updated material rebased on top of >> 3.9-rc2: >> >> The following changes since commit f6161aa1535

Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-03-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 13 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > In case we end-up with an agreement on the path those fixes should > follow, here is the location of my updated material rebased on top of 3.9-rc2: > > The following changes since commit f6161aa153581da4a3867a2d1a7caf4be19b6ec9: > > Linux 3.9-r

Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-03-13 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 03/08/2013 10:37 AM, Nicolas Ferre : > On 02/10/2013 07:45 PM, Johan Hovold : >> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which use IBGR:555

Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-03-08 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 02/10/2013 07:45 PM, Johan Hovold : > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which >>> use IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-typ

Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-03-04 Thread Johan Hovold
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:47:40PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which use > > IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-type to determine if the > > controll

Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-02-10 Thread Johan Hovold
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which >> use IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-type to >> determine if the controller uses the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-02-09 Thread Olof Johansson
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which use > IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-type to determine if the > controller uses the intensity-bit and restore the old layout in that case. > >

Re: [PATCH 0/5] at91: atmel_lcdfb: regression fixes and cpu_is removal

2013-02-08 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
HI, on all Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Best Regards, J. On 17:35 Fri 08 Feb , Nicolas Ferre wrote: > These patches fix a regression in 16-bpp support for older SOCs which use > IBGR:555 rather than BGR:565 pixel layout. Use SOC-type to determine if the > controller uses the i