On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:46 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 06/15/2015 09:10 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> I'm testing this on a few more large CPU count systems. So far, so good ...
>>
>
> John, unfortunately I'm seeing failures across a lot of the large systems
> dev/early-leap-timer as of thi
On 06/15/2015 09:10 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
>
> On 06/11/2015 06:54 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> So this is a second round at trying to address the issue, trying
>> to integrate feedback from Ingo and Thomas, trying to simplify
>> what I can. I've also split out the changes so each can be
>>
On 06/11/2015 06:54 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> So this is a second round at trying to address the issue, trying
> to integrate feedback from Ingo and Thomas, trying to simplify
> what I can. I've also split out the changes so each can be
> more easily reviewed. Its still not tiny, but its simpler.
* Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> > Well, noticing the -tip merge messages in my inbox, it may actually
> > make it for 4.2 (after all the push-back from last time, I expected
> > there would still be more), but still not something I'm wanting to
> > aggressive
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> Well, noticing the -tip merge messages in my inbox, it may actually
> make it for 4.2 (after all the push-back from last time, I expected
> there would still be more), but still not something I'm wanting to
> aggressively push to -stable.
Yes, I decided to
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:54:52PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> > So this is a second round at trying to address the issue, trying
>> > to integrate feedback from Ingo and Thomas, trying
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:54:52PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > So this is a second round at trying to address the issue, trying
> > to integrate feedback from Ingo and Thomas, trying to simplify
> > what I can. I've also split out the chang
On 06/12/2015 10:59 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:55:57AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> > > > This series has only had limited testing, so I wanted to send
> > > > it out for initial review and comment. Folks can grab this tree
> > > > via git for testing here:
>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:55:57AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> > > This series has only had limited testing, so I wanted to send
> > > it out for initial review and comment. Folks can grab this tree
> > > via git for testing here:
> > > https://git.linaro.org/people/john.stultz/linux.
On 06/12/2015 10:52 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:54:52PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > So this is a second round at trying to address the issue, trying
> > to integrate feedback from Ingo and Thomas, trying to simplify
> > what I can. I've also split out the changes so ea
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:54:52PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> So this is a second round at trying to address the issue, trying
> to integrate feedback from Ingo and Thomas, trying to simplify
> what I can. I've also split out the changes so each can be
> more easily reviewed. Its still not tin
11 matches
Mail list logo
