Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:33:47PM -0400, John Stultz wrote: > Here is backport of the leapsecond fixes to 3.0-stable. These are less > straight forward, and should get closer review. Thanks, all applied now. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in t

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread John Stultz
On 07/17/2012 12:14 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: John Stultz wrote: On 07/17/2012 11:26 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Would it be possible to put them in the kernel tree somewhere, for example under tools/testing/? Huh. I guess its possible. However I'd like to avoid starting yet-another-testing-

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
John Stultz wrote: > On 07/17/2012 11:26 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Would it be possible to put them in the kernel tree somewhere, for >> example under tools/testing/? > > Huh. I guess its possible. However I'd like to avoid starting > yet-another-testing-framework. Too late: http://thread.g

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:15:30AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > Attached are two tests. One is general exerciser of the leapsecond code > (leap-a-day) which also notes if it sees the hrtimer/futuex early > expiration issue, and the other is a much faster (almost immediate) > reproducer for the le

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread John Stultz
On 07/17/2012 11:26 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: John Stultz wrote: Are there any other test suites that folks would recommend I look into for merging these (and other time related) tests? Would it be possible to put them in the kernel tree somewhere, for example under tools/testing/? Huh. I gu

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
John Stultz wrote: > Are there any other test suites that folks would recommend I look > into for merging these (and other time related) tests? Would it be possible to put them in the kernel tree somewhere, for example under tools/testing/? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread John Stultz
On 07/17/2012 11:15 AM, John Stultz wrote: On 07/17/2012 10:57 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi John, On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:33:47PM -0400, John Stultz wrote: I've already done backports to all the stable kernels to 2.6.32, and will send out the rest soon. That's very much appreciated, thank y

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread John Stultz
On 07/17/2012 10:57 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: Hi John, On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:33:47PM -0400, John Stultz wrote: I've already done backports to all the stable kernels to 2.6.32, and will send out the rest soon. That's very much appreciated, thank you! Do not hesitate to send me your reproduc

Re: [PATCH 00/11] 3.0-stable: Fix for leapsecond deadlock & hrtimer/futex issue

2012-07-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi John, On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:33:47PM -0400, John Stultz wrote: > Here is backport of the leapsecond fixes to 3.0-stable. These are less > straight forward, and should get closer review. > > This patch set addresses two issues: > > 1) Deadlock leapsecond issue that a few reports described.