t;
> Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 4:33:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] writeback bug fixes and simplifications
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 03:56:59PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 schrieb Sascha Warner:
> > > Andrew Mor
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 03:56:59PM +0100, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 schrieb Sascha Warner:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1,
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2007 schrieb Sascha Warner:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
> >> pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. Th
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:27:38AM +0100, Sascha Warner wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
> >> pdflush often using 100% CPU
>
> P.S.: Andrew, sorry my subject pretended I was subscribed to lkml, I am not.
> I hoped for the script at lkml to pull the threads together because of
> the subject.
Find the relevant mail at lkml.org and have it forwarded to you.
Then you can do a proper reply-to-all without breaking the thre
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
>> pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare
>> pauses from its 100% usage, how
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
> > pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be s
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:08:40 +0100 Sascha Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
> pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare
> pauses from its 100% usage, however.
>
> On ~23 minutes uptime
Hi,
I applied your patches to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, but now I am faced with one
pdflush often using 100% CPU for a long time. There seem to be some rare
pauses from its 100% usage, however.
On ~23 minutes uptime i have ~19 minutes pdflush runtime.
This is on E6600, x86_64, 2 Gig RAM, SATA HDD, running
9 matches
Mail list logo
