On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > What in the world is "fast count"? I've grepped for it,
> > and I can't find it.
>
> It's your own fast-pool counter that Matt was talking about.
>
> > I can simply not credit entropy of the ti
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 12:52 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:24:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > What in the world is "fast count"? I've grepped for it,
> > > and I can't find it.
> >
> > It's your own fast-p
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:01:12PM -0400, Eric Wustrow wrote:
> Will this do the long path in add_interrupt_randomness every 16 interrupts
> instead of 128?
Yes, but given that benchmarks didn't show any performance degradation
even under a worst case scenario (i.e., no interrupt mitigation, and a
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:24:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > What in the world is "fast count"? I've grepped for it,
> > and I can't find it.
>
> It's your own fast-pool counter that Matt was talking about.
When he said "check it aga
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> What in the world is "fast count"? I've grepped for it,
> and I can't find it.
It's your own fast-pool counter that Matt was talking about.
> I can simply not credit entropy of the timer is on the irq, but I
> think you and Matt were sugges
5 matches
Mail list logo
