Re: [PATCH 01/15] cfq-iosched: Properly name all references to IO class

2012-10-03 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:54:29AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: [..] > > - return cfqg->service_trees[wl][ASYNC_WORKLOAD].count > > - + cfqg->service_trees[wl][SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD].count > > - + cfqg->service_trees[wl][SYNC_WORKLOAD].count; > > + return cfqg->service_trees[wl_c

Re: [PATCH 01/15] cfq-iosched: Properly name all references to IO class

2012-10-02 Thread Tejun Heo
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 03:32:42PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > Currently CFQ has three IO classes, RT, BE and IDLE. At many a places we > are calling workloads belonging to these classes as "prio". This gets > very confusing as one starts to associate it with ioprio. > > So this patch just does bu

Re: [PATCH 01/15] cfq-iosched: Properly name all references to IO class

2012-10-01 Thread Jeff Moyer
Vivek Goyal writes: > Currently CFQ has three IO classes, RT, BE and IDLE. At many a places we > are calling workloads belonging to these classes as "prio". This gets > very confusing as one starts to associate it with ioprio. > > So this patch just does bunch of renaming so that reading code bec