> clean. Unless there are major problems with it this looks like 2.6.25
> stuff. Would you mind to send updates/fixes against this tree?
I'd be glad to. I'd be very happy to see this stuff make 2.6.25.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
t
* Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I did do an experimental will-it-apply and got a tremendous number
> > of rejects against the x86 git tree, almost all of which went away
> > when `patch -l' was used. Seems that someone has gone on a
> > whitespace rampage through arch/x86/ia32
> I think I'll duck this lot for now in view of the (relatively small) amount
> of followup.
The debugctlmsr bits (last few patches) are meant to be taken with a grain
of salt. Everything else in this set is pretty well ready for prime time.
> I did do an experimental will-it-apply and got a tre
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:55:07 -0800 (PST) Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > This defines the new macro arch_has_single_step() in linux/ptrace.h,
> > a default for when asm/ptrace.h does not define it. It declares the
> > new user_en
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:55:07 -0800 (PST) Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This defines the new macro arch_has_single_step() in linux/ptrace.h, a
> default for when asm/ptrace.h does not define it. It declares the new
> user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions.
>
> Why should arch_has_single_step be a function-like macro? I can't thing
> of a case were this wouln't be a compile-time constant. And given that
> this is hopefully a transitionary ifdef because eventually all architectures
> would use the generic code I'd prefer ifdefs in the code that clearly
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:55:07PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This defines the new macro arch_has_single_step() in linux/ptrace.h, a
> default for when asm/ptrace.h does not define it. It declares the new
> user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions.
> This is not used yet,
7 matches
Mail list logo
