Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: cros_ec: IRQs for cros_ec should be optional

Lee, On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> Lee, >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: >> > >> >> From: Bill Richardson >> >> >> >> Preparing the way for the LPC device,

Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: cros_ec: IRQs for cros_ec should be optional

On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: > Lee, > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > >> From: Bill Richardson > >> > >> Preparing the way for the LPC device, which is just a plaform_device > >> without > >> interrupts. > >>

Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: cros_ec: IRQs for cros_ec should be optional

Lee, On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> From: Bill Richardson >> >> Preparing the way for the LPC device, which is just a plaform_device without >> interrupts. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson >> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson

Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: cros_ec: IRQs for cros_ec should be optional

On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Doug Anderson wrote: > From: Bill Richardson > > Preparing the way for the LPC device, which is just a plaform_device without > interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson > --- > drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c | 26 +- >

Re: [PATCH 02/10] mfd: cros_ec: IRQs for cros_ec should be optional

On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson wrote: > From: Bill Richardson > > Preparing the way for the LPC device, which is just a plaform_device without > interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson Reviewed-by: Simon Glass -- To unsubscribe from this list: send