On 13/12/11, John Johansen wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 06:47 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:59PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> >>> On 08/30/2013 12:56 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Tue, Au
On 12/11/2013 06:47 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:59PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>>> On 08/30/2013 12:56 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:21:55PM +0200, Oleg Nestero
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:59PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> > On 08/30/2013 12:56 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:21:55PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >> On 08/20, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> On 08/30/2013 12:56 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:21:55PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> On 08/20, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Most of the instances are current, but the one called from apparmour is
On 08/30/2013 12:56 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:21:55PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 08/20, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>>>
>>> Added the functions
>>> task_ppid()
>>> task_ppid_nr_ns()
>>> task_ppid_nr_init_ns()
>>> to safely abstract the l
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:21:55PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/20, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >
> > Added the functions
> > task_ppid()
> > task_ppid_nr_ns()
> > task_ppid_nr_init_ns()
> > to safely abstract the lookup of the PPID
>
> but it is not safe.
>
> > +st
On 08/20, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>
> Added the functions
> task_ppid()
> task_ppid_nr_ns()
> task_ppid_nr_init_ns()
> to safely abstract the lookup of the PPID
but it is not safe.
> +static inline struct pid *task_ppid(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return task_
7 matches
Mail list logo