> It looks like I'm in quite a pickle. Even if the patch for the PnPBIOS
> driver removes the errors and warnings, there may be runtime bugs in
> other drivers expecting X86_32. The only way I can see to prevent that
> is to audit all the drivers which depend on the ISA option -- a behemoth
> under
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 01:58:14PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>> I believe this is the source of the issues I encountered on my initial
>> attempt to decouple the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option. I suspect
>> if I add an explicit X86_32 dependency to the PNPBIOS driver, I will be
>> ab
> I believe this is the source of the issues I encountered on my initial
> attempt to decouple the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option. I suspect
> if I add an explicit X86_32 dependency to the PNPBIOS driver, I will be
> able to remove the X86_32 dependency from the ISA option without
> incident
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:28:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:09:22AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
>> I feel now that the introduction of the ISA_BUS option may the wrong
>> approach to resolve lack of ISA support for the X86_64 architecture;
>> adding ISA_BUS d
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:09:22AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:18:09AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > From the context, arm and mips use "select ISA". For those, adding and
> >auto-selecting ISA_BUS would make sense. For the remaining architectures
> >you coul
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:18:09AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> From the context, arm and mips use "select ISA". For those, adding and
>auto-selecting ISA_BUS would make sense. For the remaining architectures
>you could simply add "config ISA_BUS". I would suggest to update default
>configurations
On 04/08/2016 05:31 AM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:45:03PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
This means for this and other similar drivers that the driver is no longer
supported on architectures which support ISA but not the newly introduced
ISA_BUS. Affected architecture
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:45:03PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>This means for this and other similar drivers that the driver is no longer
>supported on architectures which support ISA but not the newly introduced
>ISA_BUS. Affected architectures are alpha, arm, m32r, m68k, mips, powerpc,
>and pari
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 10:47:25AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> The Apex Embedded Systems STX104 may be used on 64-bit X86 systems. This
> patch allows the Apex Embedded Systems STX104 DAC driver to be compiled
> for both 32-bit and 64-bit X86 systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: William Breathit
9 matches
Mail list logo
