On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:44 PM Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:36 PM David Howells wrote:
> >
> > Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >
> > > What I'm saying is that with a new interface the rules need not follow
> > > the rules of the old interface, because at the start no one is usi
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:36 PM David Howells wrote:
>
> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> > What I'm saying is that with a new interface the rules need not follow
> > the rules of the old interface, because at the start no one is using
> > the new interface, so no chance of breaking anything.
>
> Er. N
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> What I'm saying is that with a new interface the rules need not follow
> the rules of the old interface, because at the start no one is using
> the new interface, so no chance of breaking anything.
Er. No. That's not true, since the old interface comes through the new on
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 6:40 AM Ian Kent wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 14:30 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > While this is a standard option as documented in mount(8), it is ignored by
> > most filesystems. So reject, unless filesystem explicitly wants to handle
> > it.
> >
> > The exception
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 14:30 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> While this is a standard option as documented in mount(8), it is ignored by
> most filesystems. So reject, unless filesystem explicitly wants to handle
> it.
>
> The exception is unconverted filesystems, where it is unknown if the
> files
5 matches
Mail list logo
