On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:54:17AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:07:21PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> Some of the other patches of this type made sense, but I'd personally
> >> prefer if this one was dropped, yes. Though I am just a nobod
Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:07:21PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Some of the other patches of this type made sense, but I'd personally
>> prefer if this one was dropped, yes. Though I am just a nobody that
>> reads patches rather than one of the relevant people. ;-)
>
> It'
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:07:21PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:30:17PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> It doesn't sound like it fixes a serious issue.
> >
> > You're right, it doesn't. There are a few patches in this series that
> > were ap
Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:30:17PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> It doesn't sound like it fixes a serious issue.
>
> You're right, it doesn't. There are a few patches in this series that
> were applied because they made other patches easier to apply and this is
> one of them
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:30:17PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > From: Dave Chinner
> >
> > commit 095760730c1047c69159ce88021a7fa3833502c8 upstream.
> >
> > Stable note: Not tracked in Bugzilla. This is a diagnostic patch that
> > was part of a series addressing exc
Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner
>
> commit 095760730c1047c69159ce88021a7fa3833502c8 upstream.
>
> Stable note: Not tracked in Bugzilla. This is a diagnostic patch that
> was part of a series addressing excessive slab shrinking after
> GFP_NOFS failures. There is detailed inform
6 matches
Mail list logo
