Christoph,
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 15:44 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So both I and Rusty told you not to do this and you did it anyway.
>
> I'm quite pissed about this ignorance. Andrew, what do we do about such
> a case? Should we just revert ubi until they fixed their mess up?
Just for r
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:58:28AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Why not? We tried to avoid this but found out that this is the most
> > decent interface. Specific advises are welcome.
>
> because this type of compount interface is really painful for the user.
> the module.param=foo syntax m
Hi Rusty,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 09:03 +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 05:58 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:00:56PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > > > +module_param_call(mtd, ubi_mtd_param_parse, NULL, NULL, 000);
> > > > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 05:58 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> because this type of compount interface is really painful for the user.
> the module.param=foo syntax makes sure paramaters can be used without
> endless documentation for each and every single of them, and makes
> sure module writers do
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 05:58 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:00:56PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > > +module_param_call(mtd, ubi_mtd_param_parse, NULL, NULL, 000);
> > > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mtd, "MTD devices to attach. Parameter format: "
> > > > +
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 03:00:56PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > +module_param_call(mtd, ubi_mtd_param_parse, NULL, NULL, 000);
> > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(mtd, "MTD devices to attach. Parameter format: "
> > > + "mtd=[,,]. "
> > > + "Multiple \"mtd\" parameters may b
On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 15:00 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > This looks very odd.
>
> What exactly?
I see, will be fixed, thanks.
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PR
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 10:59 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 06:54:54PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > +/* UBI headers must take 64 bytes. The below is a hacky way to ensure this
> > */
> > +static int __ubi_check_ec_hdr_size[(UBI_EC_HDR_SIZE == 64) - 1]
> > +__att
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 06:54:54PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> +/* UBI headers must take 64 bytes. The below is a hacky way to ensure this */
> +static int __ubi_check_ec_hdr_size[(UBI_EC_HDR_SIZE == 64) - 1]
> +__attribute__ ((__unused__));
> +static int __ubi_check_ec_hdr_size[(UBI_VID_H
9 matches
Mail list logo