Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.6, v5.4.49, v4.19.130, v4.14.186,
v4.9.228, v4.4.228.
v5.7.6: Build OK!
v5.4.4
On Wed, 01 Jul 2020, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.6, v5.4.49, v4.19.130,
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.6, v5.4.49, v4.19.130, v4.14.186,
v4.9.228, v4.4.228.
v5.7.6: Build OK!
v5.4.4
On 25/06/2020 07:46:18+0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Kerneldoc valication gets confused if syntax isn't "@.*: ".
>
> Adding the missing colons squashes the following W=1 warnings:
>
> drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c:247: warning: Function parameter or member 'conf' not
> described in 'atmel_smc_cs_conf_apply
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 07:46:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Kerneldoc valication gets confused if syntax isn't "@.*: ".
>
> Adding the missing colons squashes the following W=1 warnings:
>
> drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c:247: warning: Function parameter or member 'conf' not
> described in 'atmel_smc_
5 matches
Mail list logo