Hi Steve,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:28:51 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
> > As far as I know boolean parameters take values 0 and 1, not N and Y.
>
> Not on the systems I am testing on (2.6.24-rc6) - the sysfs interface
> displays boolean parameters as Y/N, and will accept boot parameters as
> either
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:28:51 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
As far as I know boolean parameters take values 0 and 1, not N and Y.
Not on the systems I am testing on (2.6.24-rc6) - the sysfs interface
displays boolean parameters as Y/N, and will accept boot parameters as
either Y/N or
> As far as I know boolean parameters take values 0 and 1, not N and Y.
Not on the systems I am testing on (2.6.24-rc6) - the sysfs interface
displays boolean parameters as Y/N, and will accept boot parameters as
either Y/N or 0/1. Below is a snippet from a test proving this point :
[EMAIL
As far as I know boolean parameters take values 0 and 1, not N and Y.
Not on the systems I am testing on (2.6.24-rc6) - the sysfs interface
displays boolean parameters as Y/N, and will accept boot parameters as
either Y/N or 0/1. Below is a snippet from a test proving this point :
[EMAIL
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:34:39 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
> Jean - you mentioned declaring the devices as platform data & writing
> a new-style I2C driver - are there any examples of this approach I can
> refer to? I simply copied what is/was currently in-tree for this
> driver, which
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:34:39 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
Jean - you mentioned declaring the devices as platform data writing
a new-style I2C driver - are there any examples of this approach I can
refer to? I simply copied what is/was currently in-tree for this
driver, which seems to
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:34:39 +
Steve Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew/Jean,
>
> Sorry for the delay - christmas & getting mutt working delayed my
> revised patch. Here is an updated patch against 2.6.24-rc6, which
> hopefully addresses all comments made so far.
>
> Jean - you
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:34:39 +
Steve Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew/Jean,
Sorry for the delay - christmas getting mutt working delayed my
revised patch. Here is an updated patch against 2.6.24-rc6, which
hopefully addresses all comments made so far.
Jean - you mentioned
Andrew/Jean,
Sorry for the delay - christmas & getting mutt working delayed my
revised patch. Here is an updated patch against 2.6.24-rc6, which
hopefully addresses all comments made so far.
Jean - you mentioned declaring the devices as platform data & writing
a new-style I2C driver - are there
Andrew/Jean,
Sorry for the delay - christmas getting mutt working delayed my
revised patch. Here is an updated patch against 2.6.24-rc6, which
hopefully addresses all comments made so far.
Jean - you mentioned declaring the devices as platform data writing
a new-style I2C driver - are there
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:59:59 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
> Here is a patch against 2.6.23.9 which adds support for the
> Burr-Brown/Texas-Instruments
> ADS7828 12-bit 8-channel A-D converter.
>
> The chip is used for voltage monitoring on the COTS processor card I am
> currently working
Hi Steve, Andrew,
Thanks for the review Andrew. I have some more comments, I'll reply to
the original post.
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:56:44 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
> >> +static int ads7828_attach_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> >> +{
> >> +if (!(adapter->class & I2C_CLASS_HWMON))
> >>
Hi Steve, Andrew,
Thanks for the review Andrew. I have some more comments, I'll reply to
the original post.
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:56:44 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
+static int ads7828_attach_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
+{
+if (!(adapter-class I2C_CLASS_HWMON))
+
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:59:59 +, Steve Hardy wrote:
Here is a patch against 2.6.23.9 which adds support for the
Burr-Brown/Texas-Instruments
ADS7828 12-bit 8-channel A-D converter.
The chip is used for voltage monitoring on the COTS processor card I am
currently working with.
Andrew,
Thanks your your comments, I'm currently preparing/testing a revised patch
based on your suggestions, which I will post later this week.
A couple of comments inline.
Steve
I wouldn't bother with EXPERIMENTAL personally. It seems a farily
pointless thing.
OK, I copied one of the
Andrew,
Thanks your your comments, I'm currently preparing/testing a revised patch
based on your suggestions, which I will post later this week.
A couple of comments inline.
Steve
I wouldn't bother with EXPERIMENTAL personally. It seems a farily
pointless thing.
OK, I copied one of the
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:59:59 + Steve Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a patch against 2.6.23.9 which adds support for the
> Burr-Brown/Texas-Instruments
> ADS7828 12-bit 8-channel A-D converter.
>
> The chip is used for voltage monitoring on the COTS processor card I am
>
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:59:59 + Steve Hardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is a patch against 2.6.23.9 which adds support for the
Burr-Brown/Texas-Instruments
ADS7828 12-bit 8-channel A-D converter.
The chip is used for voltage monitoring on the COTS processor card I am
currently
18 matches
Mail list logo
