Len,
The call itself does not fail. acpi_table_init() has no problem
processing an empty DSDT. In fact, this is exactly what happens
today when booting our non-acpi capable kernel. The second call is
needed in the case of booting an acpi capable kernel. We need to
rebuild the DSDT and SSDT, and be
so will the 1st acpi_table_init() always fail -- even
on future machines?
-Len
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 18:47, John Keller wrote:
> To provide compatibilty with SN kernels that do and do not
> have ACPI IO support, the SN PROM must build different
> versions of some ACPI tables based on whic
2 matches
Mail list logo
