On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 08:26:30PM +0100, Bernhard Thaler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested Sven's patch in my setup and I think it should be safe to use
> it. It is shorter and cleaner written and he submitted it earlier.
Thanks for testing.
> I will be happy to assist you or Sven if any further work i
Hi,
I tested Sven's patch in my setup and I think it should be safe to use
it. It is shorter and cleaner written and he submitted it earlier.
I will be happy to assist you or Sven if any further work is needed.
Regards,
Bernhard
On 03.10.2014 13:21, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
>
>
Hi Bernhard,
Sorry for taking a bit to get back to you with feedback. We've been
discussing recently some changes in br_netfilter. Basically, to
modularize it [1] and this has taken a while.
Regarding your change. Sven Eckelmann (CC'ed in this email) sent a RFC
out of the merge window that have r
From: Bernhard Thaler
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:27:28 +0200
CC:'ing netfilter-devel and the netfilter maintainer, which is
probably the primary place this patch should have been submitted.
> Ethernet frames are not bridged to correct interface when packets have
> been NAT66ed; compared to IPv4 l
4 matches
Mail list logo
