Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: Inconsistent use of node IDs

Ping! -- Ethan Ethan Solomita wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >> On Monday 12 March 2007 23:51, Ethan Solomita wrote: >> >>> This patch corrects inconsistent use of node numbers (variously "nid" or >>> "node") in the presence of fake NUMA. >>> >> I think it's very consistent --

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: Inconsistent use of node IDs

Andi Kleen wrote: On Monday 12 March 2007 23:51, Ethan Solomita wrote: This patch corrects inconsistent use of node numbers (variously "nid" or "node") in the presence of fake NUMA. I think it's very consistent -- your patch would make it inconsistent though. It's consistent to call node_on

Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: Inconsistent use of node IDs

On Monday 12 March 2007 23:51, Ethan Solomita wrote: > This patch corrects inconsistent use of node numbers (variously "nid" or > "node") in the presence of fake NUMA. I think it's very consistent -- your patch would make it inconsistent though. > Both AMD and Intel x86_64 discovery code will det