On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 02:12:07PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> Part of the difference between our results may be that I have my
> entire userspace built with -mtune=bdver2, so less of the time is
> spent in userspace.
That still cannot explain the huge difference between building on a
mk8
On 2013-10-03 12:57, Borislav Petkov wrote:> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:27:45AM
-0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
>> wrote:
>>> improved. Building kernel 3.12-rc2 with allmodconfig using 8 jobs on a
>>> FX-8320 takes
>>>
>>> 22 minutes and 57 se
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:27:45AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
> > improved. Building kernel 3.12-rc2 with allmodconfig using 8 jobs on a
> > FX-8320 takes
> >
> > 22 minutes and 57 seconds on a kernel with CONFIG_MK8,
> > 21 minute
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> improved. Building kernel 3.12-rc2 with allmodconfig using 8 jobs on a
> FX-8320 takes
>
> 22 minutes and 57 seconds on a kernel with CONFIG_MK8,
> 21 minutes and 35 seconds on a kernel with CONFIG_GENERIC, and
> 19 minutes and 11 seco
On 2013-09-29 17:30, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:23:37PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> I'm not saying that should just be included without substantiation,
>> I simply mean that the reason to include it (as far as I am
>> concerned) is that it doesn't break anything an
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:23:37PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> I'm not saying that should just be included without substantiation, I
> simply mean that the reason to include it (as far as I am concerned)
> is that it doesn't break anything and provides something useful that
> isn't in the k
On 09/29/2013 04:50 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:41:02PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
>> While I understand that you want decisive proof that it provides
>> an improvement, does it specifically matter if the option is
>> unused by most people and doesn't result in
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:41:02PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> While I understand that you want decisive proof that it provides an
> improvement, does it specifically matter if the option is unused by
> most people and doesn't result in a negative performance hit when
> used?
Just having t
On 09/29/2013 02:01 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:54:00PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
>> From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn
>>
>> This patch adds Kconfig options to allow optimization for AMD
>> family 10h, AMD Bulldozer, and AMD Piledriver derived CPU's in
>> version 3.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:54:00PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> From: Austin S. Hemmelgarn
>
> This patch adds Kconfig options to allow optimization for AMD family
> 10h, AMD Bulldozer, and AMD Piledriver derived CPU's in version
> 3.12-rc2. These provide noticeable improvements over the
10 matches
Mail list logo
