>>> On 4/26/2016 at 08:54 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-02-09 0:29 GMT+08:00 Bruce Rogers :
> On 2/8/2016 at 08:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 03/02/2016 23:51, Bruce Rogers wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index e2951b6..21507b4 100644
>>>
2016-02-09 0:29 GMT+08:00 Bruce Rogers :
On 2/8/2016 at 08:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03/02/2016 23:51, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> index e2951b6..21507b4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>>
>>> On 2/3/2016 at 04:18 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Oops.
>
> Anyhow, I see my patch has done a similar change in init_vmcb() , so you may
> want to revert it as well.
>
> Nadav
>
> Bruce Rogers wrote:
>
>> Commit d28bc9dd25ce reversed the order of two lines which initialize cr0,
>> allowing th
On 08/02/2016 17:29, Bruce Rogers wrote:
On 2/8/2016 at 08:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03/02/2016 23:51, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> index e2951b6..21507b4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>>> On 2/8/2016 at 08:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 03/02/2016 23:51, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index e2951b6..21507b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -4993,8 +4993,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset
On 03/02/2016 23:51, Bruce Rogers wrote:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index e2951b6..21507b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -4993,8 +4993,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool
> init_event)
> vm
I hadn't noticed that one - my testcase didn't encounter any issues on
AMD. Anyways, it's probably best to revert that change as well. I'll add
that in for a v2.
Bruce
>>> On 2/3/2016 at 04:18 PM, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Oops.
>
> Anyhow, I see my patch has done a similar change in init_vmcb() , so
Oops.
Anyhow, I see my patch has done a similar change in init_vmcb() , so you may
want to revert it as well.
Nadav
Bruce Rogers wrote:
> Commit d28bc9dd25ce reversed the order of two lines which initialize cr0,
> allowing the current (old) cr0 value to mess up vcpu initialization.
> This was
8 matches
Mail list logo