On 19/11/15 10:16, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> 2015-11-19 13:51 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
>> > On 19.11.2015 13:18, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> >> However, I don't think we can disable compilation of particular
>>> >> 64-bit SoCs, so maybe there isn't much sense in splitting their
>>> >> clock drivers i
W dniu 19.11.2015 o 18:16, Tomasz Figa pisze:
> 2015-11-19 13:51 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
>> On 19.11.2015 13:18, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> However, I don't think we can disable compilation of particular 64-bit
>>> SoCs, so maybe there isn't much sense in splitting their clock drivers
>>> into
2015-11-19 13:51 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
> On 19.11.2015 13:18, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> However, I don't think we can disable compilation of particular 64-bit
>> SoCs, so maybe there isn't much sense in splitting their clock drivers
>> into separate symbols?
>
> To me it does not really matte
On 19.11.2015 13:18, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Good idea, just a couple of nits inline. Other than that:
>
> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa
>
> 2015-11-16 10:36 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
>> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
>> so it is built also
Hi Krzysztof,
Good idea, just a couple of nits inline. Other than that:
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa
2015-11-16 10:36 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski :
> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
> Th
On 17/11/15 05:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17.11.2015 13:31, pankaj.dubey wrote:
>> On Monday 16 November 2015 07:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
>>> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of
On 17.11.2015 13:31, pankaj.dubey wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 16 November 2015 07:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
>> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
>> There won't be a single kernel im
On Monday 16 November 2015 07:06 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
> multi_v7 for
Hi,
On 2015년 11월 16일 10:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Currently the Exynos5433 (ARMv8 SoC) clock driver depends on ARCH_EXYNOS
> so it is built also on ARMv7. This does not bring any kind of benefit.
> There won't be a single kernel image for ARMv7 and ARMv8 SoCs (like
> multi_v7 for ARMv7).
>
9 matches
Mail list logo