On Mon, 15 Mar 2021, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Or am I reading this wrong?
No, I read it wrong. Please ignore this patch, there are rather a few
cases that do this trickery.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 10:02:23PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> The pi_mutex->wait_lock is irq safe and needs to enable local
> interrupts upon unlocking, matching it's corresponding
> raw_spin_lock_irq().
>
> Fixes: c74aef2d06a9f (futex: Fix pi_state->owner serialization)
> Signed-off-by:
2 matches
Mail list logo
