On 2/18/21 9:34 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 2/18/21 9:25 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz
wrote:
> page st
On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:51, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 2/18/21 9:40 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:27:58PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:25, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +
On 2/18/21 9:40 AM, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:27:58PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:25, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021
On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:27:58PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:25, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On 2/18/21 9:25 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz
>>> wrote:
page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for g
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:27:58PM -0500, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:25, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz
On 18 Feb 2021, at 12:25, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz
>>> wrote:
page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguou
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 02:45:54PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz
> > wrote:
> > > page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The
> >
> > June 2014. That'
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:02:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz
> wrote:
> > page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The
>
> June 2014. That's a long lurk time for a bug. I wonder if some later
> commit revealed it.
On 2/17/21 11:02 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz
> wrote:
>
>> page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The
>> routine update_and_free_page can encounter a gigantic page, yet it assumes
>> page structs are contiguous when se
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 10:49:25 -0800 Mike Kravetz wrote:
> page structs are not guaranteed to be contiguous for gigantic pages. The
> routine update_and_free_page can encounter a gigantic page, yet it assumes
> page structs are contiguous when setting page flags in subpages.
>
> If update_and_fre
11 matches
Mail list logo