On Thu, 06 Jun 2019, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 2019-06-05 11:27 p.m., Lee Jones wrote:
> Without having the .of_full_name support, both MFD cells ended up
> wrongly matching against the i2c@c device tree node since we just
> picked the first one where of_compatible matched.
>
On 2019-06-05 11:27 p.m., Lee Jones wrote:
Without having the .of_full_name support, both MFD cells ended up
wrongly matching against the i2c@c device tree node since we just
picked the first one where of_compatible matched.
>>>
>>> What is contained in each of their resources?
On Wed, 05 Jun 2019, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 2019-06-05 12:45 p.m., Lee Jones wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> index 99c0395..470f6cb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@
On 2019-06-05 12:45 p.m., Lee Jones wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/core.h b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
index 99c0395..470f6cb 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/core.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/core.h
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ struct mfd_cell {
*/
const char
On Wed, 05 Jun 2019, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 2019-06-05 12:31 a.m., Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Jun 2019, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >
> >> Previously the MFD core supported assigning OF nodes to created MFD
> >> devices, but relied solely on matching the of_compatible string. This
> >>
On 2019-06-05 12:31 a.m., Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jun 2019, Robert Hancock wrote:
>
>> Previously the MFD core supported assigning OF nodes to created MFD
>> devices, but relied solely on matching the of_compatible string. This
>> would result in devices being potentially assigned the wrong
On Tue, 04 Jun 2019, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Previously the MFD core supported assigning OF nodes to created MFD
> devices, but relied solely on matching the of_compatible string. This
> would result in devices being potentially assigned the wrong node if
> there are multiple devices with the
7 matches
Mail list logo
