Ingo Molnar writes:
> * Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:34:21AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Alexander Yarygin wrote:
>> >
[..]
>> >
>> > What's the performance effect of this - i.e. by how much does CPU
>> > use increase due to copying the events?
>> >
>> > Would
* Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:34:21AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Alexander Yarygin wrote:
> >
> > > When processing events the session code has an ordered samples
> > > queue which is used to time-sort events coming in across
> > > multiple mmaps. At a later point
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 08:38:55PM +0400, Alexander Yarygin wrote:
> When processing events the session code has an ordered samples queue which is
> used to time-sort events coming in across multiple mmaps. At a later point in
> time samples on the queue are flushed up to some timestamp at which po
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:34:21AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Alexander Yarygin wrote:
>
> > When processing events the session code has an ordered samples
> > queue which is used to time-sort events coming in across
> > multiple mmaps. At a later point in time samples on the queue
> > a
* Alexander Yarygin wrote:
> When processing events the session code has an ordered samples
> queue which is used to time-sort events coming in across
> multiple mmaps. At a later point in time samples on the queue
> are flushed up to some timestamp at which point the event is
> actually pro
On 10/2/14, 4:32 AM, Alexander Yarygin wrote:
From: David Ahern
At this point the patch is no longer from me. You have done the
migration to ordered_events. You can change that to based on a patch
from ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:21:58PM +0400, Alexander Yarygin wrote:
> Jiri Olsa writes:
>
> [..]
>
> >
> > looks ok.. but I was wondering if we could move those repeating
> > bits in function.. something like below (untested, just compiled)
> >
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> >
>
> [..]
>
> Yep, it
Jiri Olsa writes:
[..]
>
> looks ok.. but I was wondering if we could move those repeating
> bits in function.. something like below (untested, just compiled)
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
[..]
Yep, it's better. Just checked - it works. How should we process?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this li
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:32:08PM +0400, Alexander Yarygin wrote:
SNIP
> + if (!oe->buffer) {
> + if (oe->copy_on_queue) {
> + oe->cur_alloc_size -= new_event->header.size;
> + free(new_event);
> +
9 matches
Mail list logo
