Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: Use irq_set_handler_locked()

2015-10-05 Thread Ludovic Desroches
Hi Nicolas, On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 03:57:32PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Hi all, > > Well it seems my cover letter is missing. So, here it is: > > ---8< > pinctrl: at91-pio4: fixes for current linux-next (irq) > > While testing the sama5d2 on today's linux-next I discovered that some >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: Use irq_set_handler_locked()

2015-10-04 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Le 02/10/2015 15:57, Nicolas Ferre a écrit : > Hi all, > > Well it seems my cover letter is missing. So, here it is: > > ---8< > pinctrl: at91-pio4: fixes for current linux-next (irq) > > While testing the sama5d2 on today's linux-next I discovered that some > adaptations were missing. So, I

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use irq_set_handler_locked

2015-10-02 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Use irq_set_handler_locked() as it avoids a redundant lookup of the > irq descriptor. > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: Use irq_set_handler_locked()

2015-10-02 Thread Nicolas Ferre
Hi all, Well it seems my cover letter is missing. So, here it is: ---8< pinctrl: at91-pio4: fixes for current linux-next (irq) While testing the sama5d2 on today's linux-next I discovered that some adaptations were missing. So, I don't know if you were aware but here are my fixes in case you