On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 06:05:14PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 06:09:58PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > In this code:
> > if ((worker->flags & WORKER_UNBOUND) && need_more_worker(pool))
> > wake_up_worker(pool);
> >
> > the first test is unneeded. Even the f
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 06:09:58PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> In this code:
> if ((worker->flags & WORKER_UNBOUND) && need_more_worker(pool))
> wake_up_worker(pool);
>
> the first test is unneeded. Even the first test is removed, it doesn't affect
> the wake-up logic when WO
2 matches
Mail list logo
