On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
wrote:
> When libata was merged m68k lacked IOMAP support. This has not been
> true for a long time now so allow subsystem to be used on m68k.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Gr{oetje,eeting}s
Hi,
On Sunday, January 08, 2017 02:08:23 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > * m32r: I don't know why it was restricted but it builds fine nowadays
> > (I will fix it later in incremental patch)
> >
> > * s390: no PATA ha
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 06:14:36PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> * m32r: I don't know why it was restricted but it builds fine nowadays
> (I will fix it later in incremental patch)
>
> * s390: no PATA hardware, legacy IDE subsystem is also not supported
s390 now has PCIe support, so
Hi,
On Friday, December 30, 2016 06:12:49 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 03:01:16PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > When libata was merged m68k lacked IOMAP support. This has not been
> > true for a long time now so allow subsystem to be used on m68k.
>
> Is t
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 03:01:16PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> When libata was merged m68k lacked IOMAP support. This has not been
> true for a long time now so allow subsystem to be used on m68k.
Is that dependency needed at all anymore? What exact functionality
is missing on m32r
5 matches
Mail list logo
