Namhyung Kim writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:00 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>
>> Namhyung Kim writes:
>> > Hi Peter and Kan,
>> >
>> > (Adding PPC folks)
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:01 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:54 AM L
On 11/24/2020 12:42 AM, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
On 11/24/20 10:21 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:00 PM Michael Ellerman
wrote:
Namhyung Kim writes:
Hi Peter and Kan,
(Adding PPC folks)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:01 PM Namhyung Kim
wrote:
Hello,
On Thu,
On 11/24/20 10:21 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:00 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
Namhyung Kim writes:
Hi Peter and Kan,
(Adding PPC folks)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:01 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:54 AM Liang, Kan wrote:
On 11/11/
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:00 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Namhyung Kim writes:
> > Hi Peter and Kan,
> >
> > (Adding PPC folks)
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:01 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:54 AM Liang, Kan
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
Namhyung Kim writes:
> Hi Peter and Kan,
>
> (Adding PPC folks)
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:01 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:54 AM Liang, Kan wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/11/2020 11:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM
Hi Peter and Kan,
(Adding PPC folks)
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 2:01 PM Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:54 AM Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/11/2020 11:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > >
> > >>
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:54 AM Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/11/2020 11:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> >> - When the large PEBS was introduced (9c964efa4330), the sched_task()
> >> should
> >> be invoked to flush the P
On 11/11/2020 11:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
- When the large PEBS was introduced (9c964efa4330), the sched_task() should
be invoked to flush the PEBS buffer in each context switch. However, The
perf_sched_events in account_event()
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> - When the large PEBS was introduced (9c964efa4330), the sched_task() should
> be invoked to flush the PEBS buffer in each context switch. However, The
> perf_sched_events in account_event() is not updated accordingly. The
> perf_event_
On 11/9/2020 12:33 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
Maybe we can frob x86_pmu_enable()...
Could you please elaborate?
Something horrible like this. It will detect the first time we enable
the PMU on a new task (IOW we did a context swit
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> - The patch 1 tries to fix broken per-CPU events. The CPU context cannot be
> retrieved from the task->perf_event_ctxp. So it has to be tracked in the
> sched_cb_list. Yes, the code is very similar to the original codes, but it
> is act
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:49:31AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > Maybe we can frob x86_pmu_enable()...
>
> Could you please elaborate?
Something horrible like this. It will detect the first time we enable
the PMU on a new task (IOW we did a context switch) and wipe the
counters when user RDPMC is
On 11/9/2020 6:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:52:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 01:29:33PM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Kan Liang
Sometimes the PMU internal buffers have to be flushed for per-CPU events
during a context s
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:52:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 01:29:33PM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > Sometimes the PMU internal buffers have to be flushed for per-CPU events
> > during a context switch, e.g., large PEBS. Otherwis
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 01:29:33PM -0800, kan.li...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang
>
> Sometimes the PMU internal buffers have to be flushed for per-CPU events
> during a context switch, e.g., large PEBS. Otherwise, the perf tool may
> report samples in locations that do not belong to t
15 matches
Mail list logo