On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 10:49 AM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:29:42 -0700 Josh Don wrote:
> > Busy polling loops in the kernel such as network socket poll and kvm
> > halt polling have performance problems related to process scheduler load
> > accounting.
> >
> > Both of the bu
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:19 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> > Busy polling loops in the kernel such as network socket poll and kvm
> > halt polling have performance problems related to process scheduler load
> > accounting.
>
> AFAICT you'
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:29:42 -0700 Josh Don wrote:
> Busy polling loops in the kernel such as network socket poll and kvm
> halt polling have performance problems related to process scheduler load
> accounting.
>
> Both of the busy polling examples are opportunistic - they relinquish
> the cpu if
On 23/10/20 09:19, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * preemption needs to be kept disabled between prepare_to_busy_poll()
>> + * and end_busy_poll().
>> + */
>> +BUG_ON(preemptible());
>> +if (allow_resched)
>> +preempt_enable();
>> +else
>> +pre
On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 05:30, Josh Don wrote:
>
> Busy polling loops in the kernel such as network socket poll and kvm
> halt polling have performance problems related to process scheduler load
> accounting.
>
> Both of the busy polling examples are opportunistic - they relinquish
> the cpu if ano
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 08:29:42PM -0700, Josh Don wrote:
> Busy polling loops in the kernel such as network socket poll and kvm
> halt polling have performance problems related to process scheduler load
> accounting.
AFAICT you're not actually fixing the load accounting issue at all.
> This chan
6 matches
Mail list logo