> It already has your Reviewed-by. Is it still valid?
So it does ... that was a long time ago ... but not so long that anything
important changed. Yes, still valid.
-Tony
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:16:29PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> part4 (the actual KNL piece) seems not to break earlier (Broadwell)
> system ... but that doesn't qualify enough for Ack/Review/Tested -by.
It already has your Reviewed-by. Is it still valid?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101
> For patch 2 and 3 I'd need an ack from Mauro/Tony. CCed.
parts 2 & 3 are OK
Acked-by: Tony Luck
part4 (the actual KNL piece) seems not to break earlier (Broadwell) system ...
but that doesn't qualify enough for Ack/Review/Tested -by.
-Tony
N�r��yb�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+{zX����ܨ}�
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Hubert Chrzaniuk wrote:
> From: Jim Snow
>
> Make EDAC aware of DDR4/RDDR4 mem types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Snow
> [hubert.chrzan...@intel.com: patch rebase to 4.4-rc3]
> Signed-off-by: Hubert Chrzaniuk
> ---
> include/linux/edac.h | 6 --
> 1 fi
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:51:47AM +, Anaczkowski, Lukasz wrote:
> Well, although it may sound strange, yeah this is exactly the case, since
> EDAC for Knights Landing has been for a while in our private branch.
>
> Is this sort of an issue or just curiosity?
Well, the fact that I'm asking, m
: Re: [PATCH 1/4] EDAC: add DDR4 flag
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:38:29PM +0100, Hubert Chrzaniuk wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jim Snow
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Anaczkowski
>> Signed-off-by: Hubert Chrzaniuk
>
> How am I to understand this SoB chain?
>
> Jim wrote i
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:38:29PM +0100, Hubert Chrzaniuk wrote:
> From: Jim Snow
>
> Make EDAC aware of DDR4/RDDR4 mem types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Snow
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Anaczkowski
> Signed-off-by: Hubert Chrzaniuk
How am I to understand this SoB chain?
Jim wrote it, Lukasz did s
7 matches
Mail list logo
