On 23/01/18 09:19, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:55:01AM +, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
@@ -1180,13 +1180,14 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
"qcom,controlled-remotely");
bdev->bamclk = devm_clk
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:55:01AM +, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> >>@@ -1180,13 +1180,14 @@ static int bam_dma_probe(struct platform_device
> >>*pdev)
> >>"qcom,controlled-remotely");
> >>bdev->bamclk = devm_clk_get(bdev->dev, "bam_clk");
> >
>
On 19/01/18 05:52, Vinod Koul wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 07:02:33PM +, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
When BAM is remotely controlled it does not sound correct to control
its clk on Linux side. Make it optional, so that its not madatory
s/madatory/m
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 07:02:33PM +, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla
>
> When BAM is remotely controlled it does not sound correct to control
> its clk on Linux side. Make it optional, so that its not madatory
s/madatory/mandatory
> for remote controlled B
On 16/01/18 19:38, Sagar Dharia wrote:
On 1/16/2018 12:02 PM, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
When BAM is remotely controlled it does not sound correct to control
its clk on Linux side. Make it optional, so that its not madatory
for remote controlled BAM inst
On 1/16/2018 12:02 PM, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
When BAM is remotely controlled it does not sound correct to control
its clk on Linux side. Make it optional, so that its not madatory
for remote controlled BAM instances.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
6 matches
Mail list logo
