On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:40:55AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Yes, focussing on "sane" architectures (by some definition of sane) where
> > the NMI mode is just changing the delivery restrictions allows to still
> > differentiate from which source th
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:40:55AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:55:49 +0100,
> > Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If we need to distinguish between the two, then we nee
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:55:49 +0100,
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > >
> > > If we need to distinguish between the two, then we need two flags. One
> > > that indicates the generation capability, and one that i
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:55:49 +0100,
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >
> > If we need to distinguish between the two, then we need two flags. One
> > that indicates the generation capability, and one that indicates the
> > forwarding capability.
>
> There is
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 03:03:20 +0100,
> Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 04:09:59PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > > >
> > > >I don't think this works in x86 because the local APIC irq_chip is the
> > > >root of the hierarchy; the rest of th
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 03:03:20 +0100,
Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 04:09:59PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > >>+static bool irq_supports_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > >>+{
> > >>+ struct irq_data *d = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> > >>+
> > >>+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARC
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 04:09:59PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> >>+static bool irq_supports_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct irq_data *d = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> >>+
> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> >>+ /* Only IRQs directly managed by the root irqchip can be se
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 16:09 +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> On 01/08/18 04:07, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:07:04PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > > + || WARN_ON(irq_settings_is_per_cpu_devid(desc))
> > > + || !irq_supports_nmi(desc))
> >
> > Shouldn't the logical op
Hi Ricardo,
On 01/08/18 04:07, Ricardo Neri wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:07:04PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
Hi Julien,
Many thanks for your patchset and I apologize for the late reply. I tried
to use your patches on my own use case and I have the following
comments...
Add functionalit
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:07:04PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
Hi Julien,
Many thanks for your patchset and I apologize for the late reply. I tried
to use your patches on my own use case and I have the following
comments...
> Add functionality to allocate interrupt lines that will deliver IRQs
10 matches
Mail list logo
