Al Viro wrote:
> > I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for
> > trouble with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call
> > chains have these fields initialized is bloody unpleasant and it *is*
> > going to break, especially
Al Viro wrote:
> > I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for
> > trouble with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call
> > chains have these fields initialized is bloody unpleasant and it *is*
> > going to break, especially since the rules are "you
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:38:05AM +, Al Viro wrote:
>
>> I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for trouble
>> with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call chains have
>>
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:38:05AM +, Al Viro wrote:
>
>> I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for trouble
>> with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call chains have
>> these fields initialized
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:38:05AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for trouble
> with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call chains have
> these fields initialized is bloody unpleasant and it *is* going to break,
>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:38:05AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for trouble
> with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call chains have
> these fields initialized is bloody unpleasant and it *is* going to break,
>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:38:05AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for trouble
> with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call chains have
> these fields initialized is bloody unpleasant and it *is* going to break,
>
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:38:05AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for trouble
> with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call chains have
> these fields initialized is bloody unpleasant and it *is* going to break,
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:55:51AM +, David Howells wrote:
> + * vfs_xgetattr - Get the enhanced basic attributes of a file
> + * @path: The file of interest
> + * @stat: Where to return the statistics
> + *
> + * Ask the filesystem for a file's attributes. The caller must have preset
> + *
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:55:51AM +, David Howells wrote:
> + * vfs_xgetattr - Get the enhanced basic attributes of a file
> + * @path: The file of interest
> + * @stat: Where to return the statistics
> + *
> + * Ask the filesystem for a file's attributes. The caller must have preset
> + *
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:55:51AM +, David Howells wrote:
> -int vfs_getattr_nosec(struct path *path, struct kstat *stat)
> +int vfs_xgetattr_nosec(struct path *path, struct kstat *stat)
const struct path *, please. Especially since we feed >f_path to
it. And yes, I realize that the same
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:55:51AM +, David Howells wrote:
> -int vfs_getattr_nosec(struct path *path, struct kstat *stat)
> +int vfs_xgetattr_nosec(struct path *path, struct kstat *stat)
const struct path *, please. Especially since we feed >f_path to
it. And yes, I realize that the same
Hi Andreas,
On 11/23/2016 11:57 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> ===
>>> NEW SYSTEM CALL
>>> ===
>>>
>>> The new system call is:
>>>
>>> int ret = statx(int dfd,
>>>
Hi Andreas,
On 11/23/2016 11:57 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>>
[...]
>>> ===
>>> NEW SYSTEM CALL
>>> ===
>>>
>>> The new system call is:
>>>
>>> int ret = statx(int dfd,
>>> const char
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > + case S_IFCHR: printf(" character special file\n");ft =
> > 'c'; break;
>
> This will overflow 80 columns. Could use just "character special"?
>
> > + case S_IFDIR: printf(" directory\n"); ft =
> >
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > + case S_IFCHR: printf(" character special file\n");ft =
> > 'c'; break;
>
> This will overflow 80 columns. Could use just "character special"?
>
> > + case S_IFDIR: printf(" directory\n"); ft =
> > 'd'; break;
> > +
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:55 PM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
> underlying filesystem.
>
>
>
> OVERVIEW
>
>
> The
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:55 PM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
> underlying filesystem.
>
>
>
> OVERVIEW
>
>
> The idea was initially
On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On 11/23/2016 01:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
>> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
>>
On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On 11/23/2016 01:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
>> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
>> underlying filesystem.
>>
>>
On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On 11/23/2016 01:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
>> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
>>
On Nov 23, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> On 11/23/2016 01:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
>> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
>> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
>> underlying filesystem.
>>
>>
Hi David,
On 11/23/2016 01:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
> underlying filesystem.
>
>
>
> OVERVIEW
>
>
> The idea was initially
Hi David,
On 11/23/2016 01:55 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Add a system call to make extended file information available, including
> file creation and some attribute flags where available through the
> underlying filesystem.
>
>
>
> OVERVIEW
>
>
> The idea was initially
24 matches
Mail list logo