On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 06:10:19PM +0300, Dmitry wrote:
> 2008/2/13, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > +#define WM97XX_ADCSEL_X0x1000 /* x coord measurement */
> > +#define WM97XX_ADCSEL_Y0x2000 /* y coord measurement */
> > +#define WM97XX_ADCSEL_PRES 0x
Hi,
2008/2/13, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> diff --git a/include/linux/wm97xx.h b/include/linux/wm97xx.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..f0d9fc0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/wm97xx.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
...
> +#define WM97XX_POLL0x8000 /* initiate a poll
Hi,
2008/2/13, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:58:50PM +, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > You used platform_device_register, but should be using platform_device_add,
> > otherwise you get barfs with 2.6.25-rc1 (device is initialized twice). Also
>
> Thanks for that.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:58:50PM +, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> You used platform_device_register, but should be using platform_device_add,
> otherwise you get barfs with 2.6.25-rc1 (device is initialized twice). Also
Thanks for that. I feel like I should knock up a patch to clarify the
plat
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:28:43PM -0500, Pete MacKay wrote:
> We're using the wm9712 codec with the sound/soc/pxa code configured in and
> came across this build error:
Which kernel version are you building against? I've been testing with
v2.6.24 (and have just updated to v2.6.25-rc1 which is a
> This patch series adds support for the touchscreen controllers provided
> by Wolfson Microelectronics WM97xx series chips in both polled and
> streaming modes.
We're using the wm9712 codec with the sound/soc/pxa code configured in and
came across this build error:
In file included from include/
Hi,
Mark Brown wrote:
> This patch series adds support for the touchscreen controllers provided
> by Wolfson Microelectronics WM97xx series chips in both polled and
> streaming modes.
You used platform_device_register, but should be using platform_device_add,
otherwise you get barfs with 2.6.25-
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:07:23PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> The probe error handling is not quite correct. When we reach the fragment
> above ret variable is 0 so if platfrom_device_alloc() fails we will return
> 0 and the device will be considered bound but in half-dead state. Please
> mak
Hi Mark,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 05:28:31PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> +
> + /* register our battery device */
> + wm->battery_dev = platform_device_alloc("wm97xx-battery", 0);
> + if (!wm->battery_dev)
> + goto batt_err;
...
> + batt_err:
> + input_unregister_device(wm
2008/1/26, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:18:16AM +, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > Please apply this patch.
>
> Done, thanks.
>
> > BTW: Could you please also add me to the "CC" list
> > of this patch serie?
>
> Sure.
>
Thanks!
--
With
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:18:16AM +, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Please apply this patch.
Done, thanks.
> BTW: Could you please also add me to the "CC" list
> of this patch serie?
Sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Hi,
Please apply this patch. BTW: Could you please also add me to the "CC" list
of this patch serie?
>From 1e61dd8a8c8346f925f09cae34275c9754bf2be1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:04:29 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Fix wm97xx_resume
Signed-
Hi,
Mark Brown wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +int wm97xx_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct wm97xx *wm = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* restore digitiser and gpios */
> + if (wm->id == WM9713_ID2) {
> + wm97xx_reg_write(wm, AC97_WM9713_DIG1, wm->dig[0]);
> +
13 matches
Mail list logo
