On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 10:39:04 PDT (-0700), mer...@debian.org wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 09:56:33PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 May 2017 03:50:47 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 23 May 2017 04:30:50 PDT
On Mon, 29 May 2017 03:50:47 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 May 2017 04:30:50 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
RISC-V has both 32-bit and 64-bit base ISAs, bu
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 04:30:50 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> RISC-V has both 32-bit and 64-bit base ISAs, but they are very similar.
>>> Like some other platforms, we'd like to
On Tue, 23 May 2017 04:30:50 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> RISC-V has both 32-bit and 64-bit base ISAs, but they are very similar.
>> Like some other platforms, we'd like to share one arch directory between
>> the two of them.
>
> I t
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> RISC-V has both 32-bit and 64-bit base ISAs, but they are very similar.
> Like some other platforms, we'd like to share one arch directory between
> the two of them.
I think we mainly do the others for backwards-compatibility with ancient
b
5 matches
Mail list logo