2012/10/9 Al Viro :
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:55:12PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
>
>> Thanks Al. For me there aren't problems to push it via Al or via
>> other trees. For example the patch for ext4 is in Ted's tree. You
>> tell me what you want and I do it :)
>
> Um... Then I'd better drop t
Just to confirm, the ext4 lock_super removal is commit 07724f98978a,
and Linus has already pulled it into his tree.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More major
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:55:12PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Thanks Al. For me there aren't problems to push it via Al or via
> other trees. For example the patch for ext4 is in Ted's tree. You
> tell me what you want and I do it :)
Um... Then I'd better drop the ext4 part and hold the fin
Il 09/10/2012 01:24, Al Viro ha scritto:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:58:05PM -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Hi Marco
I was sure you guys where pushing this patch through some
vfs tree. (Hence my Acked-by below). I have just sent Linus
a pull request for the 3.7 Kernel. I could perhaps append this
on
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 02:58:05PM -0700, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Hi Marco
>
> I was sure you guys where pushing this patch through some
> vfs tree. (Hence my Acked-by below). I have just sent Linus
> a pull request for the 3.7 Kernel. I could perhaps append this
> one and resend.
>
> I do want thi
On 10/06/2012 03:38 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Removed lock/unlock super.
>
Hi Marco
I was sure you guys where pushing this patch through some
vfs tree. (Hence my Acked-by below). I have just sent Linus
a pull request for the 3.7 Kernel. I could perhaps append this
one and resend.
I do want t
6 matches
Mail list logo
