Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf bench: Add --repeat option

2014-06-23 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Davidlohr, On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 20:03:57 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 23:51 +, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> Hi Davidlohr, >> >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> > Hi Namhyung, >> > >> > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf bench: Add --repeat option

2014-06-19 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 23:51 +, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Davidlohr, > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > Hi Namhyung, > > > > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > >> By adding a top-level option, I think it should be applied to all > >> benchmaks

Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf bench: Add --repeat option

2014-06-19 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Davidlohr, On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Hi Namhyung, > > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: >> By adding a top-level option, I think it should be applied to all >> benchmaks - but I guess it only supports sched messaging and futex, >> right? >

Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf bench: Add --repeat option

2014-06-19 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
Hi Namhyung, On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 15:14 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Davidlohr, > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:14:19 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and > > as a result does not really help users gain a general idea > > of how the workload pe

Re: [PATCH 1/9] perf bench: Add --repeat option

2014-06-18 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Davidlohr, On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:14:19 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > There are a number of benchmarks that do single runs and > as a result does not really help users gain a general idea > of how the workload performs. So the user must either manually > do multiple runs or just use single bo