Hi Steve,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:18:30 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:34:09 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:23:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:32:09 +0900
>> > Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> >
>> >> index 5395d37
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:34:09 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:23:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:32:09 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >
> >> index 5395d37e5e72..adc9ac70fd3c 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> >> +++ b/kern
Hi Oleg,
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 21:34:24 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 12/18, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:16:37 +0900
>> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Steve,
>> >
>> > Would you please review this and consider merging it? It seems there's
>> > no more remaining issue and
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:25:53 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I don't have test code for uprobes, and I have minimal test code for
> kprobes. How has this been tested?
Basically I tested it with a very simple example code like in the
description of this patchset and the code in the link below - note
Hi Steve,
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:23:38 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:32:09 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> index 5395d37e5e72..adc9ac70fd3c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> @@ -115,6 +115,14 @@ DEFINE_BASIC_FETCH_FUNCS(st
On 12/18, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:16:37 +0900
> Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Would you please review this and consider merging it? It seems there's
> > no more remaining issue and we want to make a progress on it. :)
> >
> > Oleg, Srikar, it'd be great if y
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:16:37 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Would you please review this and consider merging it? It seems there's
> no more remaining issue and we want to make a progress on it. :)
>
> Oleg, Srikar, it'd be great if you could confirm it though.
>
I'd feel better i
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:32:09 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> index 5395d37e5e72..adc9ac70fd3c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,14 @@ DEFINE_BASIC_FETCH_FUNCS(stack)
> #define fetch_stack_string_size NULL
>
>
> +/* uprobes don't
Hi Steve,
Would you please review this and consider merging it? It seems there's
no more remaining issue and we want to make a progress on it. :)
Oleg, Srikar, it'd be great if you could confirm it though.
Thanks,
Namhyung
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:40:23 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
Hi Masami,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:23:25 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/12/16 13:32), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> From: Namhyung Kim
>>
>> Move existing functions to trace_kprobe.c and add NULL entries to the
>> uprobes fetch type table. I don't make them static since some generic
>> routines
(2013/12/16 13:32), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim
>
> Move existing functions to trace_kprobe.c and add NULL entries to the
> uprobes fetch type table. I don't make them static since some generic
> routines like update/free_XXX_fetch_param() require pointers to the
> functions.
>
> C
(2013/12/11 10:05), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:12:36 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2013/12/09 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
>>> index 23b2d83ee5fb..d327a1c21f4b 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/t
Hi Masami,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:12:36 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/12/09 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
>> index 23b2d83ee5fb..d327a1c21f4b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_prob
(2013/12/09 15:19), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> index 23b2d83ee5fb..d327a1c21f4b 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> @@ -239,6 +239,30 @@ ASSIGN_FETCH_FUNC(bitfield, ftype),
14 matches
Mail list logo
