Re: Re: [PATCH 10/25] kprobes: fix wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:53:18PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu > > > > Can I take it through workqueue branch w/ other patches? > > Yes, of course. I think it is not a critical bug, so I can > wait for other patches. Applied to wq/for-3.9-cleanups. Thanks! -

Re: Re: [PATCH 10/25] kprobes: fix wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()

(2013/01/29 4:49), Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 12:51:37PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >> (2012/12/22 10:57), Tejun Heo wrote: >>> wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() seems largely broken. It uses >>> optimizer_comp which is never re-initialized, so >>> wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() will ne

Re: [PATCH 10/25] kprobes: fix wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 12:51:37PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2012/12/22 10:57), Tejun Heo wrote: > > wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() seems largely broken. It uses > > optimizer_comp which is never re-initialized, so > > wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() will never wait for anything once > > kprobe_o

Re: [PATCH 10/25] kprobes: fix wait_for_kprobe_optimizer()

(2012/12/22 10:57), Tejun Heo wrote: > wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() seems largely broken. It uses > optimizer_comp which is never re-initialized, so > wait_for_kprobe_optimizer() will never wait for anything once > kprobe_optimizer() finishes all pending jobs for the first time. Thank you for fixi