Re: [PATCH 10/31] mm/mpol: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT

2012-10-26 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andi Kleen wrote: > Peter Zijlstra writes: > > > Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its > > own; it wants to be compared to either a total of interleave > > allocations or to a miss count, remove it. > > > > Fixing it would be possible, but since we've gone years > > wi

Re: [PATCH 10/31] mm/mpol: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT

2012-10-25 Thread Andi Kleen
Peter Zijlstra writes: > Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its own; it wants > to be compared to either a total of interleave allocations or to a miss > count, remove it. NACK, as already posted several times. This breaks the numactl test suite, which is the only way current