On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:39:38AM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 07:24 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> On 03/30/2016 05:45 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 01/28/
Hi Will,
On 03/30/2016 07:24 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 03/30/2016 05:45 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
On 01/28/2016 03:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:57:08PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 05:45 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> On 01/28/2016 03:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:17:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu
Hi Will,
On 03/30/2016 05:45 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 01/28/2016 03:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:17:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 28 January 2016 12:20:58 Robin Murphy wro
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:37:27PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 01/28/2016 03:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:17:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thursday 28 January 2016 12:20:58 Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> >>> Any IDs specified here would only apply to
Dear all,
On 01/28/2016 03:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:17:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Thursday 28 January 2016 12:20:58 Robin Murphy wrote:
Will, Robin, thoughts?
>>>
>>> Any IDs specified here would only apply to DMA by the "platform device"
>>> sid
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 03:17:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 28 January 2016 12:20:58 Robin Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > Will, Robin, thoughts?
> >
> > Any IDs specified here would only apply to DMA by the "platform device"
> > side of the host controller itself (as would an equivale
On Thursday 28 January 2016 12:20:58 Robin Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Will, Robin, thoughts?
>
> Any IDs specified here would only apply to DMA by the "platform device"
> side of the host controller itself (as would an equivalent "iommus"
> property on pcie0 once I finish the SMMUv2 generic binding s
On 28/01/16 11:14, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:11:59PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
Add PCIe SMMU device tree node for AMD Seattle SOC.
Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 23 +
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:18:19AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:17:39AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:14:53AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:11:59PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> > > > From: Suravee Suthikulp
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:17:39AM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:14:53AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:11:59PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> > > From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
> > >
> > > Add PCIe SMMU device tree node for AMD Seattle SOC.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:14:53AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:11:59PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> > From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
> >
> > Add PCIe SMMU device tree node for AMD Seattle SOC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
> > ---
> > arch/arm64
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:11:59PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit
>
> Add PCIe SMMU device tree node for AMD Seattle SOC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 23 +++
> 1 file chan
13 matches
Mail list logo