> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Reshetova, Elena
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600
> >> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >>
> >> > [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others]
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> >> > > refcount_t type and correspondi
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Reshetova, Elena
wrote:
>
>
>> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600
>> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> > [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others]
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
>> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
>> >
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others]
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > > a ref
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:38:29 -0600
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others]
>
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. Thi
[+cc Hyper-V folks, -cc others]
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:21:04PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead t
5 matches
Mail list logo